Rel=Prev, Rel=Next and View-All Pages: New Google Guidance

Alan's picture
| 19th September 2011
Share

Google has this week launched new advice on how to mark up a series of related pages in order to allow it to better understand the relationship between those pages.  This could offer you the benefit of consolidating the pages into a single page for ranking calculations - which could be very helpful to say the least.  Examples of pages that may gain from using this markup, which involves using rel=prev and rel=next tags in a page's head section, are

  • an article or forum thread spread across multiple pages, perhaps to derive greater advertising revenues or keep the text short and easy to consume
  • a product category consisting of so many products that they can't fit on one page.  An example would be a top level category such as "Family Cars", before many filters had been applied to create smaller sub-categories that could easily fit on a page (e.g. "red 1.8L diesel automatic Volkswagen family cars near Kettering")

For more details on how to implement these tags see Google Webmaster Central: Pagination with rel=“next” and rel=“prev”.  The article is well-written and gives very clear implementation advice.  It includes a reference to a related Google post, Google Webmaster Central: View-all in search results, which describes how a rel=canonical tag can be used to specify a "View-all page", which is simply a single-page version of the content that may be presented elsewhere as a series of pages.  Google makes the claim in this article that "searchers much prefer the View-all, single-page version of content".

But do searchers much prefer View-all pages?  I'm sure they do if the View-all page is relatively short.  Using a couple of Google's own examples of where rel=prev and rel=next may be useful, however:

  • a forum thread spread across multiple pages.  I moderate forums and some threads can easily spread to 1000 or more responses.  It's unlikely a member would want all of these on a single page for viewing
  • a product category consisting of many products.  Again, a top level category could easily consist of over 1000 products.

It's interesting to note that a typical Google search yields millions of results and Google will display up to 1000 of them, by default across 100 pages at 10 results to a page.   Google isn't implementing a View-all page there!

I think the example that Google really has in mind when they state that searchers "prefer the View-all version of content" is the article that might spread over three pages or so: reducing that to one page for indexing.  This seems a fine idea.

But what to do about the long forum threads and product categories?  Should we create View-all pages for those?  I think not.  Such pages could be too big and unwieldy, and could take too long too load, which (especially given that load time is now a ranking factor) could work against the SEO rather than for it.

Another option would be to create a View-all page containing less information, e.g. a cut down version of each post in the forum or each product in the category.  This might be a good solution.  Bear in mind, however, that Google is looking to rank this View-all page in preference to a paginated page, so

  1.  don't cut out content that contains long-tail keywords for ranking and
  2. make sure if this page is going to rank well that it's a good landing page that can help the searcher achieve what you want them to achieve on your site

Another option is to deploy this strategy:

  • if your default posts or products "per-page" count is a small number (such as 10 products/page), consider changing it to a bigger number now (such as 50).  This will reduce the number of pages in your page sequences dramatically.  It will also increase the size of each page but technology has moved on - the 10 number became the standard when the Web was a lot slower than it is now and 50 seems a more appropriate number to me.  It's a good number of products to compare in one go, for example.
  • once you have shorter series of larger pages, use the rel=prev and rel=next tags as described by Google. 
  • If it's a product sequence, add a rel=canonical tag to each page in the series to make the URL of the first page in the series the canonical URL.  It's OK to do this for a product sequence, as Google's rel=canonical documentation stated that "the sort order of a table of products" was an acceptable use of a rel=canonical tag.  Since it's unlikely you would want to change the sort order of a set of article pages or forum posts, it wouldn't be as good to use a canonical tag on those series versus a product sequence.

For example, let's suppose you currently have a category of Family Cars that consists of 238 cars with 10 cars per page giving a series of 24 pages with the following URLs: 

  • /cars/family/1
  • /cars/family/2
  • ...
  • /cars/family/23
  • /cars/family/24

Here's what you could do:

  • Increase the default number of cars per page from 10 to 50.  Now only 5 pages are needed to cover the series: /cars/family/1 ... /cars/family/5
  • Add a rel=next tag to /cars/family/1, a rel=prev tag to /cars/family/5, and both a rel=prev and a rel=next tag to the intervening three pages, as described by Google
  • Add rel=canonical tags to all five pages, citing /cars/family/1 as the canonical URL.

You might also like

blog
SEO Best Practices for Retail Product Pages
For online retailers, perhaps the most important pages of a website are the product pages. Here I’ll go through some ideas for improving SEO on your product pages, product listing pages, and on-site search results pages.
By:
Sam Rose
On: 17th May 2019
Posted In:
SEO
blog
How to Align Your SEO Content with User Intent
When was the last time you reviewed your content in terms of user intent? We’re going to take a look at why you should consider the intent and buying stage of your audience when creating content, and how you can make sure each of your website pages is attracting users at different stages of the marketing funnel.
By:
Sam Rose
On: 8th March 2019
Posted In:
SEO
blog
Cheetah Running
A good website is a whole lot more than a nice design. As well as looking the part, it needs to be secure, fast and functional. This blog post will focus on the fast.
By:
Luke Holmes
On: 8th February 2019
Posted In:
SEO | Web Design & Development | Websites | Bounce Rate

Why Choose SilverDisc

Track Record Of Success

Continuously getting it right for our clients is of paramount importance and we have some great testimonies to this.

Credibility

Being Google Premier Partners and Bing Select Partners gives you the assurance that we’re fully trained, that we have demonstrated exceptional account management across a range of client spends and industries, and that our track record will continue.

Thought Leaders

We see where digital marketing is heading and position our clients to meet it. For example, we are so far ahead of the SEO game that we helped Google to write their webmaster guidelines, so you can enjoy SEO success without fear of being penalised.

Ethical & Honest

We have your best interests at heart and we give it to you straight, even if that’s painful to you or us. For example, we won’t spend your money marketing a website when it’s plain to us that the money would be wasted. We look for a win-win-win …

Focused

We listen to your individual needs, identify targets and work relentlessly towards meeting them, concentrating on what’s effective.

Driven

We exist to unlock the value of technology for business, and we love what we do. We have 25 straight years in digital marketing.

Friendly, Open and Giving

These words are at the core of our values. We build strong partnerships and go out of our way to help solve problems for clients, suppliers and the wider world.

Let's Get Started

Please fill in the form below or give us a call on 01536 316100

Follow SilverDisc